Glorify God With Your Vote part 3

We left off in the last post talking about the role of government biblical point of view and how the man in charge of the government must have certain qualifications in order to lead government in doing it’s job.

Now here’s where it’s gonna get hairy.  What about capitalism and socialism?  On the one hand, capitalism has had a bad reputation in the past for not wanting to take care of some of the people who are chewed up and spit out by the system.  On the other hand, socialism takes away personal responsibility. 

First, I don’t think it is government’s job to take money from some citizens in order to ‘bail out’ some other citizens.  Indeed, a sense of justice would dictate just the opposite.  Government’s job is to make sure that you are free to exercise your rights in your career choices.  We all want to provide for our families.  Government doesn’t have the responsibility of setting you up in business, nor does it have the responsibility of bailing you out when your business fails.  Government has the responsibility of making sure that you are protected from theft, bodily harm, and corrupt business dealings.  But if you try and fail, justice dictates that it is you who have failed and that you are not the responsibility of your fellow man.

Now, compassion in government may cause you to be bailed out, but it is not deserved, nor should it be expected from government.  There is a tension between justice and mercy in government.  Government should be at the front of the line speaking up for you when you have failed, but not at the expense of it’s other citizens.  I think this is the tension that is being walked right now by government, and I think that they have overstepped their bounds, by putting other citizens on the hook for other people’s failures.

I think government should have appealed to it’s citizens to step up and take responsibility for their fellow-citizens.  And I think that Americans would have done just that.  But instead of doing that, government has acted unjustly on the part of some of it’s citizens and deepened a divide of class in America.

Looking biblically at the issue, we must recognize that Scripture advocates both personal responsibility on the part of the individual (2 Thessalonians 3:10), and personal responsibility to those in need (James 2:14-17).  So a biblical view is, in my opinion, anti-socialist in the redistribution of wealth sense, but pro-compassion for the needy.  This is really the thrust of the second great commandment, to love our naighbor as ourselves. 

That doesn’t necessarily mean that the Bible is pro-capitalism, but choosing between the two systems is pretty much a no-brainer for me.  Capitalism helps to give the individual the opportunity to obey both the commandment to take care of himself and his family, as well as the commandment to watch over your neighbor and take an interest in his welfare on a personal level.

How does this relate to the vote?  Both major candidates voted for the bail-out of Wall Street, or what I like to call, the sell-out of the American people.  That is, they voted to take your money and give it to other people whose businesses has failed, some of which fell through corrupt dealings.  That is socialism, and the worst kind of socialism, a socialism that steals from the poor to give to the rich.  Robin Hood is standing on his head. 

This makes a third-party candidate look all the more appealing.  Especially someone like Baldwin who opposes the socialistic leanings of both major parties.

But facts are facts, Baldwin has no chance of winning, which is one reason I suspect he is running.  I would like to think that if he thought he had a chance of winning that he would have passed on the opportunity to be a candidate for President in favor of his more important role as Pastor.

But is there value to his candidacy?  I think so.

Advertisements

4 Comments

Filed under politics, worldview

4 responses to “Glorify God With Your Vote part 3

  1. Excellent analysis from a Biblical standpoint.

    I agree with your conclusion too.

    If anyone wants to send a message, look elsewhere to vote. The two main parties have sold us down the river. There isn’t enough of a difference between the two for me to not vote my conscious.

    I still can’t decide between Baldwin and Barr. But I realize it doesn’t matter.

  2. I’m not done yet, Lewis. I think I can finish in one more post though…

    I still don’t know how I’m going to vote, but I am leaning a little Baldwin, and I don’t think I can vote for the Libertarian platform. So for me it’s between McCain and Baldwin, or maybe a write-in of Fred.

  3. Hey Jeremy. I don’t like McCain all that much, but voting for a third party is just giving a better chance to Obama. I understand why people do it on principle, but I think they basically take themselves out of the equation by doing so.

  4. Rose, many people share your view. But, in fact, it all comes down to what is the statistical probability of your one vote deciding the outcome of a presidential election. Statistically speaking it is zero. So go vote your principles.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s